Regular deformations

— Adrien Douady


Douady, A. “Déformations régulières”.

Séminaire Henri Cartan 13 (1) (1960–61), Talk no. 3.

numdam.org/item/SHC_1960-1961__13_1_A2_0

NoneTranslator’s note

The translator takes full responsibility for any errors introduced in this document, and claims no rights to any of the original contents within. For more details see thosgood.net/translations.

I. The map \widetilde{\rho}

All throughout this talk, B is a \mathscr{C}^\infty manifold (resp. \mathbb{R}-analytic, resp. \mathbb{C}-analytic); \pi\colon V\to B denotes a proper mixed manifold; b_0 is a point of B; and V_0=\pi^{-1}(b_0) is thus a compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold.

Let \widetilde{\Theta} (resp. \widetilde{\Pi}) be the sheaf of germs of vertical holomorphic (resp. locally projectable holomorphic) vector fields on V. The quotient sheaf \widetilde{\Lambda}=\widetilde{\Pi}/\widetilde{\Theta} is exactly the inverse image under \pi of the sheaf \widetilde{T} of germs of \mathscr{C}^\infty fields (resp. …) of tangent vectors on B.

For every open subset U of B, set V_U=\pi^{-1}(U). The exact sequence 0 \to \widetilde{\Theta} \to \widetilde{\Pi} \to \widetilde{\Lambda} \to 0 of sheaves on V_U gives rise to a homomorphism \widetilde{\rho}_U\colon \mathrm{H}^0(U;\widetilde{T}) \xrightarrow{\pi_*} \mathrm{H}^0(V_U;\widetilde{\Lambda}) \xrightarrow{\delta} \mathrm{H}^1(V_U;\widetilde{\Theta}). Let \mathrm{R}^1\pi_*\widetilde{\Theta} be the sheaf on B defined by the presheaf U\mapsto\mathrm{H}^1(V_U;\widetilde{\Theta}). Then \widetilde{\rho} becomes a homomorphism of sheaves on B: \widetilde{\rho}\colon \widetilde{T} \to \mathrm{R}^1\pi_*\widetilde{\Theta}. In particular, we have a homomorphism \widetilde{\rho}_0\colon \widetilde{T}_0 \to \mathrm{R}^1\pi_*\widetilde{\Theta} = \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\widetilde{\Theta}) where \widetilde{T}_0 is the vector space of germs at b_0 of fields of tangent vectors to B. Finally, we have a commutative diagram \begin{CD} \widetilde{T}_0 @>{\widetilde{\rho}_0}>> \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\widetilde{\Theta}) \\@V{\varepsilon}VV @VV{\varepsilon}V \\T_0 @>>{\rho_0}> \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\Theta_0) \end{CD} where \rho_0 is the Spencer–Kodaira map [2].

For the proper mixed manifold \pi\colon V\to B to be locally trivial in a neighbourhood of the point b_0\in B, it is necessary and sufficient for the map \widetilde{\rho}_0\colon\widetilde{T}_0\to\mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\widetilde{\Theta}) to be zero.

Proof. —

  1. (Necessity). If \pi\colon V\to B is locally trivial at b_0, then, for every open subset U of B over which V is trivial, we have \widetilde{\Pi}=\widetilde{\Lambda}\oplus\widetilde{\Theta} on V_U, and so \delta\colon\mathrm{H}^0(V_U;\widetilde{\Lambda})\to\mathrm{H}^0(V_U;\widetilde{\Theta}) is zero.

  2. (Sufficiency). Let (\eta_1,\ldots,\eta_p) be \mathscr{C}^\infty vector fields (resp. …) on a neighbourhood of b_0 in B, such that (\eta_1(b_0),\ldots,\eta_p(b_0)) forms a basis of the tangent space T_0 to B at b_0. It then follows from the hypothesis that the map \mathrm{H}^0(V_0;\widetilde{\Pi}) \to \mathrm{H}^0(V_0;\widetilde{\Lambda}) is surjective. So let (\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_p) be projectable holomorphic vector fields on a neighbourhood of V_0 in V, that project to (\eta_1,\ldots,\eta_p). Let f be the map defined on a neighbourhood of \{0\}\times V_0 in \mathbb{R}^p\times V_0 (resp. \mathbb{C}^p\times V_0) by f(t_1,\ldots,t_p,y) = e^{\xi_1}(t_1,e^{\xi_2}(\ldots,e^{\xi_p}(t_p,y)\ldots)). It follows from the proposition stated in [1] that f induces an isomorphism of mixed manifolds from U\times V_0 to \pi^{-1}(f_1(U)) over f_1, where U is a sufficiently small cubical neighbourhood of 0 in \mathbb{R}^p, and f_1 is the map from U to B defined by f_1(t_1,\ldots,t_p) = e^{\eta_1}(t_1,e^{\eta_2}(\ldots,e^{\eta_p}(t_p,b_0)\ldots)), which proves the theorem.

II. The regular case

For all b\in B, set V_b=\pi^{-1}(b). Consider the family \{\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b)\}_{b\in B} of finite-dimensional \mathbb{C}-vector spaces, and, for all b\in B, the map \varepsilon_b\colon \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\widetilde{\Theta}) \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b).

For every open subset U\subset B, we have a map \widetilde{\varepsilon}_U\colon \mathrm{H}^1(V_U;\widetilde{\Theta}) \to \prod_{b\in U}\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_B) that defines, by varying U, a homomorphism from the sheaf \mathrm{R}^1\pi_*\widetilde{\Theta} to the sheaf \Phi on B defined by \Phi(U)=\prod_{b\in U}\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b).

We say that the proper mixed manifold \pi\colon V\to B is regular if

  1. the dimension of \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b) does not depend on the point b\in B; and
  2. we can endow E=\bigcup_{b\in B}\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b) with the structure of a \mathscr{C}^\infty vector bundle (resp. …) such that \widetilde{\varepsilon} is an isomorphism from the sheaf \mathrm{R}^1\pi_*\widetilde{\Theta} to the sheaf of germs of \mathscr{C}^\infty sections (resp. …) of the bundle E.

In fact, Kodaira and Spencer have shown [2] that, by identifying the \mathrm{H}^1 spaces with spaces of harmonic forms, condition (2) is a consequence of condition (1).

Then Theorem 1 has the following corollary:

For the proper mixed manifold \pi\colon V\to B to be locally trivial, it is necessary and sufficient for it to be regular and, for all b\in B, for the Spencer–Kodaira map \rho_b\colon T_b \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b) to be zero.

Indeed, since \widetilde{\varepsilon} is injective, this condition implies that the map \widetilde{\rho}_b\colon \widetilde{T}_b \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\widetilde{\Theta}) is zero for all b.

At the end of this talk, we will construct a counter-example which shows that it is necessary to assume that the mixed manifold is regular.

III. An example of non-regular deformation: Hopf manifolds

1. Hopf manifolds

Let n\geqslant 2 be an integer, and let b be an (n\times n) matrix with coefficients in \mathbb{C}, whose eigenvalues are all of modulus >1. The free group L(b) generated by b acts freely on \widetilde{V}=\mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\}, and the quotient space \widetilde{V}/L(b), which we call the Hopf manifold defined by b, is a compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold that is homeomorphic to S^{2n-1}\times S^1.

Note that V_b and V_{b'} are isomorphic if and only if there exists some a such that b'=aba^{-1} or b'=ab^{-1}a^{-1} (cf. Appendix).

Let \Theta be the sheaf of germs of holomorphic fields of tangent vectors on V_b.

We can identify \mathrm{H}^0(V_b;\Theta) with the vector space of matrices that commute with b, and \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta) has the same dimension as this vector space.

Proof. If X is a vector field on an open subset U\subset\widetilde{V}, then b_*(X) is the vector field on the open subset b(U) given by transporting via b, i.e. b_*X(u)=bX(b^{-1}u). Let \mathscr{U}=\{U_i\} be a cover of V by simply connected Stein open subsets; for all i, set \widetilde{U}_i=\chi^{-1}\{U_i\}, where \chi is the canonical map from \widetilde{V} to V_b. The cover \widetilde{\mathscr{U}}=\{\widetilde{U}_i\} of \widetilde{V} consists of Stein open subsets that are invariant under b (not necessarily connected, but this doesn’t matter). Then b_* defines a map, again denoted by b_*, from the group of cochains C^\bullet(\widetilde{V},\widetilde{U};\Theta) to itself.

We have the exact sequence 0 \to C^\bullet(V_b,\mathscr{U};\Theta) \xrightarrow{\chi^*} C^\bullet(\widetilde{V},\widetilde{U};\Theta) \xrightarrow{1-b_*} C^\bullet(\widetilde{V},\widetilde{U};\Theta) \to 0.

Proof. The only thing that we need to verify is that the map 1-b_* is surjective. For all (i_0,\ldots,i_q), let U'_{i_0,\ldots,i_q} be an open subset of \widetilde{V} such that \chi\colon U'_{i_0,\ldots,i_q} \to U_{i_0,\ldots,i_q} is a homeomorphism. The \widetilde{U}_{i_0,\ldots,i_q} is a disjoint union of the b_*^p U'_{i_0,\ldots,i_q}, where p\in\mathbb{Z}, and every \gamma\in C^q(\widetilde{V},\widetilde{U};\Theta) can be written in the form \gamma=\gamma_1-\gamma_2, with \gamma_1=0 on b^p(U'_{i_0,\ldots,i_q}) for p<0, and \gamma_2=0 for p\geqslant 0. Set \beta = \sum_{p\geqslant 0} b_*^p\gamma_1 + \sum_{p<0} b_*^p\gamma_2 (which is a locally finite sum). Then \beta-b_*\beta=\gamma, whence Lemma 1.

Now, to finish the proof of Proposition 2. From Lemma 1, we have the following exact sequence: 0 \to \mathrm{H}^0(V_b;\Theta) \xrightarrow{\chi^*} \mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta) \xrightarrow{1-b_*} \mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta) \xrightarrow{\delta_*} \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta) \xrightarrow{\chi^*} \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V}y\Theta) \xrightarrow{1-b_*} \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V};\Theta). We can show that \chi^*\colon \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta) \to \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V};\Theta) is zero: if n>2, it is evident, since \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V};\Theta)=0; if n=2, then a direct calculation on the cochains of a cover of \widetilde{V} by two Stein open subsets shows that 1-b_*\colon \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V};\Theta) \to \mathrm{H}^1(\widetilde{V};\Theta) is bijective.

Now \mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta) is the space of holomorphic vector fields on \widetilde{V}, but such a field extends to a holomorphic vector field on \mathbb{C}^n, and \mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V},\Theta)=L\oplus M, where L is the space of fields of linear vectors, and M is the space of fields of second-order vectors at 0. The subspaces L and M are invariant under b_*, and 1-b_*\colon M\to M is an isomorphism. Then Proposition 2 follows from remarking that, if an element of L is represented by a matrix a, then b_*a=bab^{-1}.

2. Mixed manifolds whose fibres are Hopf manifolds

Let B be the set of all (n\times n) matrices with coefficients in \mathbb{C} with eigenvalues all of modulus >1. This is an open subset of \mathbb{C}^{n^2}. Let \alpha be the transformation from B\times\widetilde{V} to itself defined by \alpha(b,x)=(b,b(x)). The free group L(\alpha) generated by \alpha acts linearly on B\times\widetilde{V}, and the quotient V=B\times\widetilde{V}/L(\alpha) is a \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold. By endowing it with the projection \pi\colon V\to B induced by the projection \pi_1\colon B\times\widetilde{V}\to B after passing to the quotient, we obtain a \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed manifold that is proper, but not regular. Indeed, condition 1 of the definition of regular mixed manifolds is not satisfied: for example, for n=2, the dimension of \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta) is 4 if b is a scalar matrix, but 2 in all other cases.

Note that the dimension of \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b) is an upper semi-continuous function of b, and that the set of b such that \dim\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta_b)\geqslant k is a closed analytic subspace of B. This is a general result, that we hope to be able to prove in a later talk of this seminar.

3. Calculation of \rho

We have T_b=\operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{C}^n,\mathbb{C}^n)=L\subset\mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta), and we defined, to prove Proposition 2, a surjective map \delta_*\colon L\to\mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta).

The Spencer–Kodaira map \rho is given, for the mixed manifold studied in this section, by \rho(a) = \delta_*(ab^{-1}). In particular, it is surjective, and its kernel is the space of matrices of the form [\ell,b] for \ell\in L.

Proof. Let a\in T_b=L. Let \{U_i\} be a cover of V_b by simply connected Stein open subsets, and, for each i, let U'_i be a connected component of \widetilde{U}_i.

Let \eta'_i be the projectable holomorphic field on U'_i defined by \eta'_i(x)=(a,0); let \widetilde{\eta}_i be the projectable holomorphic field on \widetilde{U}_i defined by \widetilde{\eta}_i=\alpha_*^k\eta'_i on b^k(U'_i); and let \eta_i be the projectable holomorphic field on U_i corresponding to \widetilde{\eta}_i. By definition, \rho(a) is the cohomology class of the cochain \{\theta_{ij}\}, where \theta_{ij}=\eta_j-\eta_i is a vertical holomorphic field on U_{ij}.

Set \widetilde{\eta}_i(x)=(a,\beta_i(x)). Then \beta\in C^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta), and we have (1-b_*)\beta=ab^{-1}\in L\subset\mathrm{H}^0(\widetilde{V};\Theta). Indeed, \alpha_*\eta=\eta, \alpha_*\eta_i(b_{-1}x)=\eta_i(x), and \alpha_*(a,\beta(b^{-1}x)) = (a,\beta(x)), whence ab^{-1}x + b\cdot\beta(b^{-1}x) = \beta(x). We thus deduce that \theta=\delta_*(ab^{-1}), which proves Proposition 3.

4. A counter-example

Take n=2, and \sigma\in\mathbb{C} such that |\sigma|>1. Let B'\subset B be the set of matrices of the form \begin{pmatrix} \sigma & t \\0 & \sigma \end{pmatrix} where t\in\mathbb{C}, and let V'=\pi^{-1}(B') be the mixed manifold induced by V over V'; now B' is a line, and its tangent space T'_b at b is generated, for all b, by a=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix}. It follows from Proposition 3 that the Spencer–Kodaira map \rho'\colon T_b(B') \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_b;\Theta) is zero if and only if b \neq b_0 = \begin{pmatrix} \sigma & 0 \\0 & \sigma \end{pmatrix} since, if b\neq b_0, then a=[\ell,b], where \ell=\begin{pmatrix}t^{-1}&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}; and if b=b_0, then \rho' is injective.

We can also see that V' is trivial on B'\setminus\{b_0\}.

Let \varphi\colon\mathbb{C}\to B'\subset B be the map defined by \varphi(t) = \begin{pmatrix} \sigma & t^2 \\0 & \sigma \end{pmatrix} and let V^\varphi be the mixed manifold given by the inverse image of V under \varphi. The Spencer–Kodaira map \rho_t^\varphi from \mathbb{C} to \mathrm{H}^1(V_{\varphi(t)};\Theta) is the composition \rho'_{\varphi(t)}\circ\mathrm{D}\varphi\colon \mathbb{C} \to T'_{\varphi(t)} \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_{\varphi(t)};\Theta), and this is zero for all t, since, if t\neq0, then \rho'_{\varphi(t)} is zero; and, if t=0, then \mathrm{D}\varphi is zero.

However, the mixed manifold V^\varphi is not locally trivial, since V_0^\varphi is not isomorphic to V_t^\varphi for t\neq0.

5. Question (K. Srinivasacharyulu)

We know that the Hopf manifolds are non-K"{a}hler, and thus non-algebraic. For n=2, the manifold V_b admits non-constant meromorphic functions if and only if b can be diagonalised with eigenvalues \sigma_1 and \sigma_2 satisfying \sigma_1^p=\sigma_2^q for some integers p and q (and there is then the function x_1^px_2^{-q}). The set of b satisfying this property is neither open nor closed, but it is a countable union of closed analytic subspaces. An analogous phenomenon arises for deformations of complex tori. Is this result general?

Appendix

With the notation of §III.1, let f\colon V_b\to V_{b'} be an isomorphism of \mathbb{C}-analytic manifolds. This lifts to an isomorphism of universal coverings \widetilde{f}\colon \mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\} \to \mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\}. By Hartog, \widetilde{f} extends to an isomorphism g\colon\mathbb{C}^n\to\mathbb{C}^n. We necessarily have g(bz) = (b')^kg(z) \tag{$*$} where z\in\mathbb{C}^n, and k is an integer; the same property, applied to the inverse map of g, shows that k=\pm1. Let a be the linear map that is tangent to g at the origin; the identity (*) then gives \begin{aligned} ab &= (b')^ka \\k &= \pm1 \end{aligned} whence b' = aba^{-1} \quad\text{or}\quad b'= ab^{-1}a^{-1}.

Bibliography

[1]
A. Douady. Variétés et espaces mixtes. 1960. 13(1).
[2]
K. Kodaira, D. Spencer. ‘On deformation of complex analytic structures, I’. Annals of Math. 67 (1958), 328–401.