Mixed manifolds and mixed spaces

— Adrien Douady


Douady, A. “Variétés et espaces mixtes”.

Séminaire Henri Cartan 13 (1) (1960–61), Talk no. 2.

numdam.org/item/SHC_1960-1961__13_1_A1_0

NoneTranslator’s note

The translator takes full responsibility for any errors introduced in this document, and claims no rights to any of the original contents within. For more details see thosgood.net/translations.

I. Category of models

Let B be a topological space. We define the category \mathscr{S}_B^n in the following manner: the objects of \mathscr{S}_B^n are the open subsets of B\times\mathbb{C}^n, and a morphism f\colon U\to U' from an open subset U\subset B\times\mathbb{C}^n to an open subset U'\subset B\times\mathbb{C}^n is a continuous map f\colon U\to U' satisfying the following two conditions:

  1. the diagram \begin{CD} U @>f>> U' \\@V{\pi_1}VV @VV{\pi_1}V \\B @= B \end{CD} commutes, where \pi_1 denotes the projection of B\times\mathbb{C}^n to B; and
  2. for all x\in B, the map f_x\colon U_x\to U'_x is holomorphic, where U_x = \{z\in\mathbb{C}^n \mid (x,z)\in U\} (and similarly for U').

If B is endowed with the structure of a \mathscr{C}^\infty manifold (resp. an \mathbb{R}-analytic manifold, resp. \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold), then we obtain a category \mathscr{C}^\infty\mathscr{S}_B (resp. \mathbb{R}\mathscr{S}_B, resp. \mathbb{C}\mathscr{S}_B) by requiring the morphisms to be \mathscr{C}^\infty (resp. \mathbb{R}-analytic, resp. \mathbb{C}-analytic).

More generally, if f_1\colon B\to B' is a continuous map from one topological space to another, then a morphism of \mathscr{S}_{f_1} is a continuous map f from an object U of \mathscr{S}_B to an object U' of \mathscr{S}_{B'} such that

  1. the diagram \begin{CD} U @>f>> U' \\@V{\pi_1}VV @VV{\pi_1}V \\B @>>{f_1}> B' \end{CD} commutes; and
  2. f_x\colon U_x\to U'_{f_1(x)} is holomorphic for all x\in B.

If f_1 is a \mathscr{C}^\infty map from one \mathscr{C}^\infty manifold to another, then f will be a morphism of \mathscr{C}^\infty\mathscr{S}_{f_1} if, further, it is a \mathscr{C}^\infty map (resp. …). We thus obtain, for every category of topological spaces, a fibred category \mathscr{S}^n (resp. \mathscr{C}^\infty\mathscr{S}^n, resp. …).

II. The definition of mixed spaces and mixed varieties

1. First definition

Let B and V be separated spaces, and let \pi\colon V\to B be a continuous map. The structure of a mixed space over B is defined on V by a system of charts \varphi_i\colon U_i\to V, where the (U_i) are objects of \mathscr{S}_B^n; for each i, \varphi_i is a homeomorphism from U_i to an open subset of V such that the diagram \begin{CD} U_i @>{\varphi_i}>> V \\@V{\pi_1}VV @VV{\pi}V \\B @= B \end{CD} commutes; finally, for all i and all j, the “change of chart” \varphi_j^{-1}\circ\varphi_i is an isomorphism of \mathscr{S}_B from an open subset of U_i to an open subset of U_j.

The structure thus defined is that of a (\mathscr{C}^0,\mathbb{C})-mixed space. If B is a \mathbb{C}-analytic space, and if the change of chart maps are all \mathbb{C}-analytic, then we have a \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed space. In this case, V itself is a \mathbb{C}-analytic space, and the fibres V_x=\pi^{-1}(x) are \mathbb{C}-analytic sub-manifolds.

If B is a \mathscr{C}^\infty manifold (resp. \mathbb{R}-analytic, resp. \mathbb{C}-analytic), and if the change of chart maps are all \mathscr{C}^\infty (resp. …), then we have a (\mathscr{C}^\infty,\mathbb{C})-mixed manifold (resp. (\mathbb{R},\mathbb{C}), resp. (\mathbb{C},\mathbb{C})). In this case, V itself is a manifold. Note that the notion of a (\mathbb{C},\mathbb{C})-mixed manifold, or a \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed manifold, reduces to simply having a \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold V endowed with a projection \pi\colon V\to B onto another \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold such that \pi is of maximal rank at every point.1

Let \pi\colon V\to B and \pi'\colon V'\to B' be mixed spaces, and let f_1\colon B\to B' be a continuous (resp. …) map. Then a morphism from V to V' over f_1 is a continuous map f\colon V\to V' such that the diagram \begin{CD} V @>f>> V' \\@V{\pi}VV @VV{\pi'}V \\B @>>{f_1}> B' \end{CD} commutes, and such that, for any charts \varphi_i\colon U_i\to V and \varphi'_j\colon U'_j\to V', the map {\varphi'_j}^{-1}\circ f\circ\varphi_i is a morphism of \mathscr{S}_{f_1} (resp. …) from an open subset of U_i to U_j.

2. An equivalent definition

We now give another way of defining mixed spaces, equivalent to the above.

Given separated spaces B and V, along with a continuous map \pi\colon V\to B, the structure of a pre-mixed space consists of the structure of a \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold on each fibre V_x=\pi^{-1}(x). Given pre-mixed spaces \pi\colon V\to B and \pi'\colon V'\to B', along with a continuous map f_1\colon B\to B', a morphism of pre-mixed spaces over f_1 is a continuous map f\colon V\to V' such that the diagram \begin{CD} V @>f>> V' \\@V{\pi}VV @VV{\pi'}V \\B @>>{f_1}> B' \end{CD} commutes and induces a \mathbb{C}-analytic map on each fibre.

A mixed space is a pre-mixed space \pi\colon V\to B such that every point y\in V admits a neighbourhood W in V that is isomorphic as a pre-mixed space to an open subset of B\times\mathbb{C}^n, via an isomorphism over the identity. The morphisms of mixed spaces are the same: mixed spaces form a full subcategory.

3. Deformations

A mixed space \pi\colon V\to B is said to be proper if B is locally compact and the map \pi is proper (i.e. the inverse image of any compact subset is compact). If it is a mixed manifold, then we can show that it is a fibred manifold that is locally trivial with respect to the underlying \mathscr{C}^\infty structure, but the previous talk shows that, in general, any two fibres are not isomorphic as \mathbb{C}-analytic manifolds.

Let V_0 be a compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold, B a locally compact space, and b_0\in B. Then a \mathbb{C}-analytic deformation of V_0 over (B,b_0) consists of a proper \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed space \pi\colon V\to B along with an isomorphism of \mathbb{C}-analytic manifolds i\colon V_0\to\pi^{-1}(b_0).

The goal of this seminar is the study, at least local, and an attempt at a classification of, \mathbb{C}-analytic deformations of a given compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold V_0.

Let V_0 be a compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold. A \mathbb{C}-analytic deformation (\pi\colon V\to B,i\colon V_0\to V) of V_0 is said to be locally complete if, for any other deformation (\pi'\colon V'\to B',i'\colon V_0\to V') of V_0, there exists a neighbourhood B'_1 of b'_0 in B', an analytic map f_1\colon B'_1\to B with f_1(b'_0)\to b_0, and a morphism of \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed spaces f\colon {\pi'}^{-1}(B'_1)\to V over f_1 such that f\circ i'=i. The deformation is said to be locally universal is furthermore the germ of f_1 at b'_0 is determined uniquely by this condition.

It seems that every compact \mathbb{C}-analytic manifold V_0 admits a locally complete \mathbb{C}-analytic deformation, and a locally universal one if the group of automorphisms of V_0 is discrete.

III. Vector fields

1. Study on models

Let B be a space, U an object of \mathscr{S}_B (i.e. an open subset of B\times\mathbb{C}^n), b_0 a point of B, and set U_0=\pi^{-1}(b_0).

A holomorphic field of tangent vectors on U_0 (i.e. a holomorphic map from U_0 to \mathbb{C}^n) is said to be a vertical holomorphic field on U_0. A vertical holomorphic field on U is a continuous (resp. …) map \theta\colon U\to\mathbb{C}^n that induces a vertical holomorphic field on each fibre U_x. If f\colon U\to U' is an isomorphism in \mathscr{S}_B, then the transport f_*\theta of \theta by f is defined by f_*\theta(f(x,z)) = \mathrm{D}_2 f_{x,z}\cdot\theta(x,z) where \mathrm{D}_2 f_{x,z} is the linear map from \mathbb{C}^n to itself that is tangent to f_x at the point z\in U_x. This is again a vertical holomorphic field, since it follows from a Cauchy integral that the matrix \mathrm{D}f_{x,z} depends continuously on the pair (x,z).

Now suppose that B is a \mathscr{C}^\infty manifold, just for simplicity, and let T_0 be the tangent space to B at b_0. A field of tangent vectors to U defined on U_0, i.e. a map \omega\colon U_0\to T_0\times\mathbb{C}^n, is said to be a projectable holomorphic field if \omega(b_0,z)=(t_0,\theta(z)) (where t_0\in T_0 is a vector that does not depend on z, called the projection of the field \omega) and \theta(z) is a holomorphic vector field. If B is a \mathbb{C}-analytic space, possibly with a singularity at b_0, then we give the same definition, but with T_0 then being the Zariski tangent space to B at b_0, i.e. the dual of \mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2, where \mathfrak{m} is the ideal of germs at b_0 of holomorphic functions on B that vanish at b_0.

If f\colon U\to U' is an isomorphism of \mathscr{C}^\infty\mathscr{S}_B (resp. …), then then transport f_*\omega is defined by f_*\omega(f(b_0,z)) = \mathrm{D}f_{b_0,z}\omega(b_0,z) where \mathrm{D}f_{b_0,z}\colon T_0\times\mathbb{C}^n\to T_0\times\mathbb{C}^n is now the linear map that is tangent to f at the point (b_0,z). This is a projectable holomorphic field. Indeed, the matrix \mathrm{D}f_{b_0,z} can be written as \begin{pmatrix} I & 0 \\\mathrm{D}_1f & \mathrm{D}_2f \end{pmatrix} and \begin{aligned} \mathrm{D}_1f\colon T &\to \mathbb{C}^n \\\mathrm{D}_2f\colon \mathbb{C}^n &\to \mathbb{C}^n \end{aligned} both depend holomorphically on z (for \mathrm{D}_1f, this follows from the fact that f_x is holomorphic for every x). By setting f_*\omega(b_0,z')=(t_0,\theta'(z')), we have \begin{gathered} \theta'(z') = \mathrm{D}_1f_{b_0,z}(t_0) + \mathrm{D}_2f_{b_0,z}(\omega(z)) \\\text{if }z'=f_{b_0}(z) \end{gathered} which shows that f_*\omega is indeed a projectable holomorphic field.

A projectable holomorphic field on U is a \mathscr{C}^\infty field of vectors tangent to U that induces a projectable holomorphic field on each fibre.

2. Vector fields on a mixed manifold

Let \pi\colon V\to B be a (\mathscr{C}^\infty,\mathbb{C})-mixed manifold (resp. …, resp. a \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed space). By transporting along the charts, we define the notions of

  • vertical holomorphic fields on an open subset of a fibre;
  • vertical holomorphic fields on a open subset of V;
  • projectable holomorphic fields on an open subset of a fibre; and
  • projectable holomorphic fields on an open subset of V.

Let \xi be a \mathscr{C}^\infty vector field (resp. …) on V. By integrating \xi, we obtain a \mathscr{C}^\infty map, denoted by e^\xi, from an open subset W\subset\mathbb{R}\times V containing \{0\}\times V (resp. \mathbb{C}-analytic map from an open subset W\subset\mathbb{C}\times V) to V, characterised by

  1. e^\xi(t_1+t_2,y) = e^\xi(t_1,e^\xi(t_2,y)), with the left-hand side being defined whenever the right-hand side is; and
  2. \frac{\partial}{\partial t}e^\xi(t,y)|_{0,y} = \xi(y).

Note that W is a mixed manifold over \mathbb{R}\times B (resp. a mixed space over \mathbb{C}\times B).

For e^\xi\colon W\to V to be a morphism of mixed spaces over the projection \mathbb{R}\times B\to B, it is necessary and sufficient for \xi to be a vertical holomorphic field. For e^\xi\colon W\to V to be a morphism of mixed spaces over a map from an open subset of \mathbb{R}\times B containing \{0\}\times B to B, it is necessary and sufficient for \xi to be a projectable holomorphic field.

The proof is left to the reader.

IV. The Spencer–Kodaira map

Let \pi\colon V\to B be a mixed manifold (resp. a \mathbb{C}-analytic mixed space), b\in B, and V_0=\pi^{-1}(b_0). Let T_0 be the tangent space to B at b_0 (resp. the Zariski tangent space). We introduce the following sheaves on V_0:

  • \Theta_0: the sheaf of germs of vertical holomorphic fields on V_0 ;
  • \Pi_0: the sheaf of germs of locally projectable holomorphic fields on V_0 ; and
  • \Lambda_0: the sheaf \pi^*T_0, i.e. the sheaf of germs of locally constant maps from V_0 to T_0.

We have an exact sequence of sheaves on V_0 0 \to \Theta_0 \to \Pi_0 \to \Lambda_0 \to 0 that gives rise to the long exact sequence in cohomology \ldots \to \mathrm{H}^0(V_0;\Pi_0) \to \mathrm{H}^0(V_0;\Lambda_0) \xrightarrow{\delta} \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\Theta_0) \to \ldots. We also have a canonical map \iota\colon T_0 \to \mathrm{H}^0(V_0;\Lambda_0) that is injective if V_0 is non-empty, and surjective if V_0 is connected.

The Spencer–Kodaira map is the composition \rho_0 = \delta\circ\iota\colon T_0 \to \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\Theta_0).

This map is an essential tool in the local study of deformations of \mathbb{C}-analytic varieties. Note that \Theta_0 is exactly the sheaf of germs of holomorphic fields of tangent vectors to V_0, and thus depends only on V_0, while T_0 depends only on the base. Also, \Theta_0 is a coherent analytic sheaf on V_0, and, if V_0 is compact, then \mathrm{H}^1(V_0;\Theta_0) is a finite-dimensional vector space over \mathbb{C} [1]. We thus see that, in this case (which is the only case where we can say anything non-trivial), \rho_0 might be possible to calculate.

It is clear that, if the given mixed manifold is trivial (i.e. if V=B\times V_0, with \pi being the projection to B), then the map \rho_0 is zero. The next talk aims to show that, in a certain sense, \rho indicates the non-triviality of V in a neighbourhood of V_0.

Bibliography

[1]
H. Cartan. Un théorème de finitude. 1953. 6.
[2]
K. Kodaira, D. Spencer. ‘On deformation of complex analytic structures, I’. Annals of Math. 67 (1958), 328–401.

Footnotes

  1. [Trans.] The more common modern nomenclature is to simply call such an object a family of complex manifolds.↩︎